The Speaker of Parliament announced today that a total of 45 Fundamental Rights (FR) petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the proposed Online Safety Bill. The bill, currently under scrutiny, has sparked controversy due to concerns about its potential impact on online freedom.

Petitioners who have lodged these challenges represent a diverse group, including political parties, journalists, and social activists. Their collective concern revolves around the bill's provisions, which have been criticized for curbing online freedoms and expression.

The Supreme Court is poised to play a pivotal role in this ongoing debate. It will take on the responsibility of reviewing the 45 petitions, examining their merits, and ultimately delivering a determination. This decision is expected to carry significant weight in shaping the future of the Online Safety Bill.

The controversy surrounding this legislation underscores the broader discussions on digital rights, freedom of expression, and the role of legal measures in ensuring online safety. The Supreme Court's engagement with these petitions signifies a critical juncture in this discourse and will provide insights into the legal aspects and implications of the bill.