A petition opposing the controversial Online Safety Bill was submitted to the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka. The petition, filed by freelance journalist Tharindu Uduwaragedara, contends that specific provisions within the Bill do not align with the country's Constitution.

Tharindu Uduwaragedara's petition highlights concerns that certain aspects of the Online Safety Bill may violate fundamental human rights, particularly the cherished right to freedom of speech and expression. This legal challenge underscores the growing apprehension surrounding the legislation, which has drawn extensive debate and critique.

In his petition, Uduwaragedara seeks a court order that would require the Online Safety Bill to be passed with a two-thirds majority in Parliament and through a national referendum. This demand reflects the petitioner's belief that the gravity and potential impact of the Bill warrant thorough consideration and broad-based approval.

The Online Safety Bill, which has recently been a focal point of legislative activity, was introduced in Parliament earlier today by Minister of Security Tiran Alles. The Bill has been met with controversy due to concerns over its provisions and their implications for online freedom and safety.

Uduwaragedara's petition is expected to be the first of several legal challenges against the Online Safety Bill, as various groups and individuals voice their reservations about its content and potential consequences.